- root_mount_point was used initially for logging c1a139995 (adding new
bootloader job options are to use grub for BIOS, gummiboot for efi set
extra mountpoint when efi is found)
- the trace was removed since 533031b3c ([bootloader] print() does not
log)
- The Python configuration tests sometimes need extra setup, so
do that through a CMakeTests.txt file in the test directory.
- Patch up existing tests:
- grubcfg needs /tmp/calamares/etc/default to exist
- rawfs won't work on FreeBSD because of differences in /proc
- drop the *discard* from filesystems-on-SSD in the standard example
configuration.
- keep the table **with** *discard* around for referece and explanation.
Remember that the example configurations are intended as **examples**,
to document available settings, and do not reflect a sensible
production configuration.
FIXES#1395
clean up obsolete lines in welcomeq.qml
add requirement section from welcome.conf to welcomeq.conf
data shows correctly in Recommended.qml, fails to show any in Requirements.qml if run without admin rights
This makes it possible to remove QML from Calamares, possibly yielding
a smaller, lighter installer; it takes with it the nice slideshow,
modern configurable navigation and the QML UIs built for various modules.
By default, WITH_QML is on and the "normal" feature set is retained.
- look for Qml modules only when WITH_QML is on (the default)
- look for Network, since that's pulled in only implicitly
- disable the QML Calamares models (modules/*q) if no QML is
enabled; longer-term plan is to merge the **pages** back to
the "upstream" modules, and have things be run-time switchable,
but that's not here yet. Also disable the notesqml module when
QML is off.
- reminder to make all the ABI-relevant WITH_* settings available as #defines
- move the compilation of KDSAG to the calamares executable, not the library
- when DBus activation is on, drop all of kdsingleapplicationguard
- It is the requirements model (checking) that reports progress, and now
the model is accessible (ask for it with requirementsModel(), make the
messages come from there.
The requirements-checker in the Welcome module was not connected
to the module-manager's idea of what the requirements are, but
the *next* button was. So you could get in a situation where the
welcome modules' requirements were met, but **other** modules failed:
no display of the problem, and a disabled *next* button.
Rip out the welcome module's requirements-checking model, move it
to the module-manager, re-do the signals between the lot.
- The architecture of letting someone build up a list of requirements
from data emitted by the ModuleManager is broken: if it gets loaded
later, it will miss data; passing around complicated objects is
no fun anyway. Get rid of it, on the way to "ModuleManager has
its own model of requirements".
- Give the ModuleManager a RequirementsModel -- that is the source
of truth about the module-requirements of the modules managed
by that particular ModuleManager.
- Let the RequirementsChecker operate on a given RequirementsModel.
- The requirements are collected by ModuleManager, checked
by an internal RequirementsChecker and changes to the
requirements state are all signalled from ModuleManager.
By connecting the requirements in the welcome modules' Config
only to their own configs -- and immediately checking them,
which is bad on its own -- we end up with a disconnect between
what the ModuleManager says about requirements, and what
the welcome modules report on.
