Modules nearly always have a Config and either a Job or ViewStep
as their "top level" components. Everything else is implementation-
detail. The *partition* module was unusual in that those two
"top level" components were tucked away in subdirectories.
Shuffle them to the top: this makes it more clear that these
two files are there to coordinate the module.
You'll need a VM with 2 disks to demonstrate:
- Configure Calamares to pick "none" as initial action on
the partition page (this is a safe choice),
- Enter partition page,
- No action is selected, and the next> button is greyed out.
- Click erase; notice next> is now available.
- Change devices, notice no action is selected, but next>
is still available. Clicking on it, though, does nothing.
When changing to "no action", update the next-button's
availability.
The code doesn't match the comment: there are no by-ref captures
in the code, and the shadowing of parameters and local variables
is confusing. Remove one variable that is passed in as an argument
(and just pass the value as argument) and copy-capture the other
rather than doing weird argument passing.
- remove unused this captures from lambda
- rename variables that are short, cryptic, and shadowed
- remove documentation for parameters that don't exist
- point to main Calamares site in the 'part of' headers instead
of to github (this is the "this file is part of Calamares"
opening line for most files).
- remove boilerplate from all source files, CMake modules and completions,
this is the 3-paragraph summary of the GPL-3.0-or-later, which has
a meaning entirely covered by the SPDX tag.
- The enum for install choice was copied into PartitionActions and
used in the Config object; its definition does not belong in the UI.
- Chase the renamings required.
With PR calamares/calamares#1357 the label of the "Manual partitioning" option
was changed, which introduced several downsides:
* The label is shown for UEFI and for BIOS installations.
* The mountpoint of the ESP is and should be distro specific.
* The label always mentioned GPT, which is irrelevant.
* The label should explain, what the option does, and not, what
problems can occur under certain circumstances.
