- Transifex tools complain about missing Q_OBJECT (which makes
some sense -- you end up with a different context for calls
to tr(), of the base class).
This is intended to apply translations to some common Qt UI components.
Example: a QMessageBox with standard buttons OK and Cancel; the text
for that is determined at startup using the system locale, and later
changes to the current locale or the current translation catalog,
do not affect OK and Cancel. It might be possible to load a catalog
with the right translation strings, except that there is no way to
know what the context or catalog **is** for the strings that are
used to label standard buttons: they can come from Qt base, or
the platform, or the theme. Merely loading the Qt Base translations
for the correct language does not help, because those translations
do not contain an "OK" string with the context used for standard
buttons.
Do the translation by hand; then we have all of the Calamares
languages covered, too, which is more than the Qt translations do.
rewrite of keyboardq.qml, reduce stackview to 2, use a combobox for
keyboard models list
colors set to configurable
.xml files used for keyboard layouts, about a dozen added now
builds, runs, actions record as intended, GS filled correctly
- India (when in English) should use the English variant, not Hindi
- While here, fix up minor items in code:
- Typo in comment
- Asturian doesn't need a special case (which didn't match, anyway)
- Don't debug-log a country-name that might be entirely wrong
(the layout is English, variant "in" but "in" interpreted as
a country is Indonesia, and the actually-desired name is eng_in
which isn't a QLocale name at all -- just like the Hausa and Igbo
special cases)
The test was loading the config file (for testing) either from the
build directory or possibly the source directory; if the config
in the build-dir was edited (for other testing purposes) then
the test would fail. Load only the source-dir version of the file.
- improve logging
- fix failing tests -- the observed and expected behavior is
to fill in a fallback check-URL, not change to an empty list,
- **except** if there's no requirements key in the config
at all; this is a bit weird, but let's make the tests
document existing behavior so we can notice if it changes.
- Setting 'id' (which changes the Global Storage key that
gets used) is a kludge when the existing module-instance
name can be used instead -- and **was** already used, as
a fallback when 'id' is not set. There's no point in having
two places to set a particular name.
- Rip out the docs for 'id' as well.
- Add documentation on the difference between single-selection
(the QML implementation) and model-selection (what the Widgets
version does).
- use updateGlobalStorage() for both single-selection and
model-based approaches, although the model-based one
needs extra parameters.
- complain about inconsistent settings and API calls (e.g.
setting a model and single-selection at the same time)
- pkgc -> packageChoice and similar for methods, variables
- document that this is the convenience value for one-selection
QML modules, not a full model
- use std::optional to keep track of which one is being used.
The Config object can hold all of the configuration information,
including also the requirements-checking parts. Move requirements-
checking configuration there, so it is shared and consistent
across welcome and welcomeq, regardless.
This repairs the test that expects the Config object to handle
**all** of the configuration, too.
- Branding, Settings, and ModuleManager may all be nullptr,
in which case the corresponding code shouldn't call methods
of those instances -- this is demonstrated by just creating
a Config object
- previously, updateSwapChoicesTr() wanted to be a static free function,
but it needs QObject::tr() ; drop the unnecessary parameter (since it
is a member function).
QString -> Id for translations in the external API, to avoid
accidentally converting a QLocale name (e.g. ca_ES) into a
Calamares translation name. This preserves special-cases
like ca@valencia and sr@latin.
- when activating the page, the "guess" functions do their
work and afterwards the config is left in a "guessable"
state, but if the user makes a specific choice, then
the config leaves the "guessable" state and the user's
explicit choice is preserved.
FIXES#1744
- expose only intended API, guessLayout() becomes internal and static
- rename onActivate() since it was *called* for activation, but does
something totally different.
- Long and complicated, nested, lambdas are not convenient for reasoning.
- The debug messages from the innermost lambda have a totally useless
function name, which makes debugging harder.
- do not link (explicitly) to Calamares libraries, the CMake
functions do that automatically.
- while here, tidy and remove commented-out-bits
- while here, remove unneeded includes
- the message had been arbitrarily changed; change it back
- update (warning) message when there is progress in checking the
model, so it doesn't stay at "unchecked" until you change language
- minor clean-ups
- The Config object owns the requirements model, and has messages /
strings describing the state of the model. Use that message,
dropping the duplicate message from the requirements widget.
- Re-jig to pass the Config object around rather than the model
that it owns.
- This does not work, because translation events do not arrive
(and the slot isn't called automatically either).
Rather than Config asking its (owning) ViewStep what the title
is -- all existing implementations have a prettyName() for that --
move the title into Config and re-do-the ViewSteps to use it.
Rename init() to something meaningful.
- the Page displays a simple message describing what the
summary is all about; Config has the same message,
use that. Needed some re-jigging to get the signals
and slots right.
- Create Config object, even if it's not used just yet
- Introduce onLeave() for the Page, better name than
(re-)creating the content (!?) when leaving
Config classes, which intend to be shared between widgets-
and QML-based view-steps, should not tie closely to internals.
None of the ParserStatus methods are used in a meaningful
way (init() can be called by the view step).
